|
|
This is May/June's edition of Nuclear Alert, GM & D CND's bi-monthly newsletter. For an up-to-date list of upcoming events and actions, click hereNews: Power
Watch:
Dear CND
Supporter, Many MPs have shifted their positions to oppose nuclear weapons and more will do so in the months and years to come, as they realise the extent of the majority public opposition to new nuclear weapons. All the arguments are in our favour and more and more people are realising that. This is a key step in the process of winning the struggle for nuclear abolition. The tables are turning in our favour and sanity will ultimately prevail. CND will
continue to campaign tirelessly against Trident replacement and for initiatives,
which will eliminate nuclear weapons from Britain and the entire world.
Your continued support is vital to encourage our government to adopt policies
of peace and true security. Kate Hudson
The Nuclear
Information Services (NIS) issued a claim in Judicial Review on March
30th. Together with Peacerights they are calling for governmental accountability
on the questions of illegality and due process in the replacement of Trident
in the Government's White Paper, 'The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear
Deterrent'. They refute the claim that retaining Trident is consistent
with our obligations under the NPT, and say the failure to consult properly
is illegal. Di McDonald of NIS said "In 200 years' time, nuclear weapons will be viewed with the abhorrence felt about slavery. As in 1807, the law is the means to redress unacceptable social practices, and Britain can take the international lead again - before it is too late." Please write to your MP to thank them for voting against Trident replacement or asking why they voted for replacement. This is a vital part of the continuing campaign to reverse the decision made on the 14th March. Here are sample letters for you to use.
A recent Populus / More 4 News poll shows that 72% of the public do not want Britain to replace Trident now. I will continue campaigning against the government's hugely unpopular decision to replace Trident, and I ask that you continue in your principled opposition to the plan. The government has admitted that last week's decision is reversible, and I hope that you will do everything in your power to make sure that it is reversed. I would also like you to raise the question of multilateral disarmament initiatives with the government. The NPT Preparatory Committee is meeting in Vienna in May, and I would like to know what initiatives the government is proposing to comply with its disarmament commitments. Please write back to let me know how you plan to proceed on this issue. Thank you
once again for saying 'no' to a nuclear future. I look forward to hearing
from you soon.
A recent Populus / More 4 News poll shows that 72% of the public do not want Britain to replace Trident now. I will continue campaigning against the government's hugely unpopular decision to replace Trident, and I ask that you reconsider your position on this issue. According to a recent legal opinion by Rabinder Singh QC and Christine Chinkin of Matrix Chambers, a renewal of Trident will likely constitute a material breach of Article VI of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It will also undermine Britain's efforts to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons around the world. With the NHS in the midst of further cuts and numerous other beneficial programmes facing funding crises, it beggars belief that up to £76 billion will be spent to renew a Cold War-era weapons system which will not protect us against the most prominent threats we now face - climate change and terrorism. I would also like you to raise the question of multilateral disarmament initiatives with the government. The NPT Preparatory Committee is meeting in Vienna in May, and I would like to know what initiatives the government is proposing to comply with its disarmament commitments. The government
has admitted that the decision to replace Trident is reversible, and I
strongly encourage you to help lead Britain and the world to a nuclear-free
future by taking a stand against Trident replacement. Please write back
to let me know how you plan to proceed on this issue. Yours sincerely
Frank Boulton
In opening, Jeremy Corbyn and Kate Hudson referred to the successful achievement of the Staff and all concerned in the campaign to get a substantial vote against Trident replacement. Kate urged that we press home our advantage, with 72% of the British electorate against deciding now to replace Trident. The international issues are 1) the US still attempts to control the Middle East, with its policies on NATO, Iran and the missile defence system, which may lead to an arms race with China, and 2) increasing opposition to nuclear weapons from all quarters. There was a discussion about the reported police figure of 10,000 at the London demo when Westminster Council made it 80,000. It was agreed that it is very difficult to get an exact figure, but CND had taken the matter up with the police, who denied giving the low figure. The media must be refuted when their information is so clearly wrong. CND's Chair Kate Hudson told us that CND will have a presence to lobby at the Non Proliferation Prep Com in May. We should write to the Foreign Office "asking what steps the UK is taking to fulfill its NPT obligation to pursue - in good faith - nuclear disarmament"? In workshops there were many good suggestions for our future campaigning against replacing Trident, including a new film, and writing to all who changed their view during the campaign for the debate to ask what made them decide. The good news was reported that CND now has charitable status for its education work. The new 'Nuclear Education' pack is a collection of the latest activities produced by CND for use in schools and sixth form colleges as well as some youth and community settings. The pack aims to provide a balanced, accessible approach to the history, facts and debates surrounding nuclear weapons and based on the belief that young people should be empowered with accessible knowledge of the current debates facing our society and supported in reaching their own opinions. CND is the biggest single issue organisation in the country, with 32,000 members in Britain. This is a good number but if each of the 32,000 recruited one new member CND would be bolstered to the tune of at least £384,000 (based on minum £12 part/low-waged rate). Action: Request the Now More Than Ever leaflet from the GM&D CND office and encourage a friend, family member or work colleague to join CND.
Jon gave resounding congratulations to the staff and officers of CND and said we should be proud of them. Council agreed and applauded everyone involved in the No Trident Replacement campaign. He said the arguments have shifted about nuclear disarmament. We had undoubtedly won the moral argument but had failed to convince the UK public about disarmament because they feared the threat from the East. But it is the warmongers who are still living in the 80s and 90s - it is CND who is in tune with the times. The UK faces no nuclear threat. Tony Blair
and Des Browne have admitted that there is no nuclear threat from anywhere.
It is global warming and individual acts of terrorism that are the real
threats and as such there is no case for rearmament. What is needed is
a war on poverty and deprivation, both in the UK and abroad. Jon made an interesting point when he said the only unilateralists are those wanting nuclear rearmament. No technical case has been made for the early replacement of the submarines and the real reason for the haste was Tony Blair's wish for his 'legacy'. This early decision to rearm means that we have unilaterally pre-empted the talks due to take place at the Non Proliferation Treaty Preparation Committee in May. In the next phase of campaigning against Trident replacement coalitions are going to be key, with CND at their core. Faith leaders have said that the use and even possession of nuclear weapons is immoral. Other coalitions are with the green movement, such as FoE and Greenpeace and with intellectual and cultural communities. He congratulated CND for the successful motivation of thousands of constituents to lobby their MPs. Only 34/35 rebels were needed for a majority. Yet all together 100 MPs voted against replacement now and MPs from every party voted for the amendment. 12 Labour MPs abstained. This was the largest rebellion on domestic issues ever, thanks to CND. The government
were obviously concerned and major concessions were won: they said that
approximately 2 years would be needed to work on the concept, 7 years
on the design and a further 9 -10 years to build the submarines. The major
spending of tens of billions will only begin when the design is completed.
The government also agreed to hold another vote at the end of the concept
period. This gives us the chance to challenge them again to build exponentially
on what we have gained. This will coincide with the NPT talks, so we need
to start mobilising now! Ms Sturgeon published the latest YouGov polling figures, which showed that 65 per cent of Scots think that if a majority of Scottish MPs vote in Parliament against the replacement of Britain's Trident nuclear missiles, a replacement nuclear missile system should not be sited in Scotland. The polling also showed that 72 per cent of Scots think that the replacement of the Trident nuclear missile system is a bad use of public money.
People living
around the site of the 1986 nuclear disaster in Ukraine have unusually
high levels of physical abnormalities and birth defects. The International
Atomic Energy Agency has suggested that the abnormalities are caused by
the impact of relocation and stress on the population, and Timothy Mousseau,
at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, wanted to put this to the
test. Mousseau and his colleagues examined 7700 barn swallows from Chernobyl and compared them with birds from elsewhere. They found that Chernobyl's swallows were more likely to have tumours, misshapen toes and feather deformities than swallows from uncontaminated parts of Europe (/Biology Letters/, DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0136). "We don't fully understand the consequences of low doses of radiation," says Mousseau. "We should be more concerned about the human population." Audit
Trail! Eeek!
A mere matter of weeks after the UK government announced that it was preparing to spend over £76 billion on replacing Trident British Energy is reportedly holding secret talks with Scottish and Southern Energy and Centrica regarding plans to invest £30 billion to build new nuclear power stations in the UK. How much money is earmarked for investment in alternative energy? This is in complete disregard of a statement from the non-nuclear countries of Ireland, Iceland, Norway and Austria stating "It is our collective view that the current debate seeks to downplay the environmental, waste, proliferation, nuclear liability and safety issues and seeks to portray nuclear energy as a clean, safe and problem free reponse to climate change." They added "after 50 years of nuclear power, waste remains the most intractable issue. The inherent risks and problems associated with the nuclear energy option remain and it cannot therefore claim to be a clean alternative to fossil fuel use."
Action: Write to your MP demanding that no more nuclear waste be created. Already the de-commissioning of 20 nuclear power stations and the relocation of waste from sea-side nuclear stations (global warming = rising sea levels!) will mean tons of nuclear waste shipped around. No More!
A well-known and respected figure at Eccles Quaker meetings, he played an important role at the monthly meetings of the Quaker Peace Group in Manchester. On occasions for leafleting, and also in the vicinity of peace vigils, he loved to find his own pitch and hand out an incredible number of leaflets in spite of chatting with passers-by. At his flat one could, quite literally, scarcely move for books; moreover he'd actually read them as most were littered with his annotations. In the aftermath of the Second World War Bob was called up for National service, in the course of which he became an objector, and served some months in prison. In recent years he was a prominent figure at events at Manchester Peace Garden marking International Conscientious Objectors' Day. This year's ceremony will be on Sunday 13th May (see Diary for details). His close
friend Rita Grundy, membership secretary at Salford CND, has written an
appreciation, or as she calls it, a CELEBRATION of Bob's astonishingly
varied life and activities. This 'celebration' is available from the GM&D
CND office.
On Wednesday 18th April, one of the leading voices against nuclear proliferation was silenced when Nagasaki Mayor Itcho Itoh died from gunshot wounds. He was 61. Here is a remembrance from Mayor Itoh's friend and fellow peace acivist, Tadatoshi Akiba, Mayor of Hiroshima. I prayed wholeheartedly for his recovery, but just received the report of his passing. I am filled with profound sorrow and outrage. The use of violence to suppress political activities is an obvious threat to democracy and cannot be tolerated. For 12 years, since taking office as the mayor of Nagasaki in 1995, Mayor Itoh served as vice president of Mayors for Peace. As mayors of A-bombed cities, we worked together to persuade the world to abolish nuclear weapons and build genuine and lasting peace. At the NPT Review Conference in New York in 2000, Mayor Itoh represented Mayors for Peace with an eloquent speech at UN headquarters, then met with many government representatives to defend the absolute necessity of total nuclear weapons abolition. In part because of his efforts, the final document from that conference included an unequivocal undertaking by the nuclear weapon States to accomplish the total elimination of their nuclear arsenals. Five years
later, at the NPT Review Conference in 2005, he participated in a Mayors
for Peace delegation that included the representatives of 80 cities. He
helped to lead 40,000 people gathered from around the world on a march
through the streets of New York. He again rose before world leaders to
forcefully present the expectations of the A-bombed cities. I will never
forget the bold resolve with which he worked to abolish nuclear weapons,
and I find it extremely painful to imagine about how he must feel about
having been cut down before the I vow to inherit his passion and, working with the 1,608 members of Mayors for Peace, do everything in my power to bring about the truly peaceful, nuclear-weapon-free world he so strongly desired. I hereby express my great respect and admiration for Mayor Itoh's achievements and offer my heartfelt condolences and prayers for his peaceful repose. April 18, 2007 Tadatoshi
Akiba
Interesting
Reading |